SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1559827609334979v1
3/4/310    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Going, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Laudermilk, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

Osteoporosis and Strength Training

Scott B. Going, PhD

Department of Nutritional Sciences, Center for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Arizona, Tucson, going{at}u.arizona.edu

Monica Laudermilk

Department of Nutritional Sciences, Center for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Arizona, Tucson

Osteoporosis is a major public health problem. Mechanical strain, imparted by muscle action and ground reaction forces, regulates bone size, shape, mineral mass, and density and subsequently bone strength. Thus, physical activity is critical for bone development, bone health, and fracture risk reduction. Animal studies, in which strain can be manipulated and measured directly, consistently show bone responds to high-strain magnitudes and rates, and only a few repetitions are needed to elicit a response. Extrapolation to humans suggests resistance exercise may be effective for osteoporosis prevention. Indeed, strength-trained athletes have significantly higher bone mass and density than athletes and nonathletes who do not engage in similar training. Prospective studies also support the benefits of resistance exercise demonstrating slowed bone loss and often an increase of 1% to 3% in regional bone mineral density, especially in women. Although more work is needed to define the optimal dose and the effects of nonmechanical factors (eg, nutritional, endocrine, body composition) on the response, the effects of resistance exercise on muscle mass and strength, balance, and agility, in addition to direct skeletal benefits, underscore its importance for osteoporosis, falls, and fracture prevention.

Key Words: osteoporosis • resistance training • exercise • bone • bone density • bone strength • children • women • men

This version was published on July 1, 2009

American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, Vol. 3, No. 4, 310-319 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1559827609334979


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement